Micro Focus Unified Functional Test, formerly known as QTP (QuickTest Professional), has been around for more than two decades. Through its lengthy tenure in the software testing space, many software teams have been able to evaluate the pros and cons of this software testing tool, and have shared their feedback for the community to consider.
Here are some of the highlights of the pros and cons of Micro Focus UFT, with input directly from reviews found around the software community.
Overview of Micro Focus UFT
First released in 2001, Micro Focus UFT has been around a long time, but has also made several significant recent updates. It can be considered both a mature and active software test automation product, and has recently introduced artificial intelligence functionality to its repertoire.
That said, this automated testing software project has changed hands a few times, having been first written by Mercury Interactive, then acquired by Hewlett-Packard in 2006 before ultimately being sold to Micro Focus in 2016.
In terms of pricing, you’ll need to reach out to the Micro Focus sales team to get a quote for your team. Keep in mind that it’s one of the pricier automation testing tools available on the market.
New features recently added to Micro Focus UFT
Micro Focus UFT has introduced several improvements in recent updates under the branding Micro Focus UFT One. Here are some of the highlights among the new features of Micro Focus UFT One:
- AI-powered test automation and advanced OCR aim to deliver advanced object recognition by identifying and interacting with visual objects on the screen in a more natural way, thereby increasing test resilience. AI Mockup Identification applies similar concepts to mockups, so you can start building and running tests earlier in your development process. Other AI-powered features in UFT One include AI Text Matching, AI Transformation Assistant, AI Recording, Remote AI Service, and Automatic Scrolling.
- A more modern look and feel has been introduced with the UFT One product update, which includes a clean design, ability to toggle a dark theme, and other UI updates to the object repository, keyword view, and add-in manager.
- A next-gen object spy is a revamp of their existing object spy tool that provides a visually intuitive way to design tests, but with improved flexibility and more modern functionality. The object spy allows you to drag and drop multiple objects, add multiple objects to a test or object repository, modify description properties of objects, and add objects to external repositories not associated with the current test.
- Support for Microsoft Chromium Edge has also been added, allowing teams to download and run tests in parallel or choose Chromium Edge specifically.
- Azure DevOps server can now also be used with UFT One, allowing customers to trigger test runs from a local file system, ALM, or ALM Test Lab module when running UFT One on a Windows Machine.
- A new data table supports .XLSX format for UI tests and promotes faster response times, along with support for new formulas and functions, dashes and spaces in parameter names, extended maximum cell content length, vastly extended limit on number of columns, and jumping to any specific cell by using cell coordinates.
- Other improvements introduced include performance acceleration boasting speeds up to three times faster, dynamic add-in loading, parallel execution enhancements for API testing and Java, Docker containers for API testing, support for spinning up multiple Hyper-V instances running UFT One, cloud OCR, text-based test objects, several mobile testing enhancements and more.
Pros of Micro Focus UFT
In terms of market reception, here are some of the key aspects of Micro Focus UFT that have received praise:
- User-friendly features for less technical team members
- Strong integration capabilities with third-party tools
- Wide support across applications and environments
- Support for continuous integration with Jenkins, QC, ALM, TeamCity, and so forth
- Support for web, mobile, and desktop automation
Cons of Micro Focus UFT
In terms of drawbacks, here are some of the key points from critical reviews out in the market:
- There have been some complaints about performance degradation and issues with crashing
- Many teams might find the Micro Focus UFT licensing to be too costly
- Report exports support a limited set of file types, such as HTML and PDF, but may lack support for other file types
Whether or not your team chooses to use Micro Focus UFT will need to be a decision that takes into account the specific needs and situation of your team. If performance and price are important priorities for your team, you may want to consider other options that offer a free or open source version, like testRigor or Selenium.